Legend:
Questions from the Audience are presented in red.
Answers by the Speaker are in black.
The Moderator's comments are in blue.
|
Mary Rosenblum |
Hello, everyone and welcome to our Professional Connection Live Interview! |
|
Tonight, for our Professional Connection Live interview, we'll be chatting with Daniel N. Steven, publishing attorney and consultant specializing in serving writers, editors, and publishers through the Internet. Daniel, welcome! |
|
|
I must say that I'm very pleased to have a lawyer as a guest...one who has an interest in writing and is a writer himself! Too many new writers really don't understand rights or what they are! |
|
|
I certainly remember how naive I was when I began writing. And I know that I get a lot of questions about copyright. A lot of new writers really think that they need to register their copyrights, and there are some scams out there that profess to do just that. Can you explain that automatic copyright to our listeners? |
|
|
For example, take 'Asimov's Magazine'. They deposit two copies in the Library of Congress, I believe, but do not register copyright so if I wanted ironclad protection, I should register on my own? |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
Regarding Asimov's magazine, the question was is when Asimov registers their magazine, does that mean you lose the right to your story? |
|
And the answer is |
|
|
No. The registration by Asimov's Magazine is for their editorial content, it does not include |
|
|
the individual stories by freelancers, unless it was "work for hire." |
|
|
this means that you can (and should!) still register the copyright to your story |
|
|
even though it was included in a copyrighted magazine. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
Would you compare the 'automatic copyright' and what it means to |
|
the registered copyright and what it means, one more time! Thanks! |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
Sure. Since 1978, in the United States, the minute the you raise your pen |
|
from paper, or your computer saves to disk, you have copyright. |
|
|
This means that you are entitled to sue for infringement, however |
|
|
first you will have to register -- that's a prerequisite for filing suit. |
|
|
In addition, if you register within 3 months of first publication |
|
|
you will be entitled to additional remedies-- "statutory" damages |
|
|
and attorneys fees that are valuable to have. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
So if you have a real concern about infringement, then it's wise to register at publication? |
|
Daniel Steven |
That's correct. You can register before, but its really not necessary. And chances your work will change before publication. |
|
Mary Rosenblum |
I'm curious, Daniel, just how common IS infringement? If you're not Stephen King, I mean? |
|
Daniel Steven |
Infringement is quite common |
|
but rarely is it worth filing suit over. Basically it is the threat of a lawsuit |
|
|
that will get an infringer to stop doing it. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
And that really doesn't require registration, does it? Just a lawyer's letterhead? :-) |
|
'Stop or I'll sue!" |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
That's correct. We send a "cease and desist" letter. |
|
If the infringer is a legitimate company or reputable person |
|
|
generally we can negotiate an end to the infringement and a settlement. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
This seems to be more common in epublishing these days... A couple of years ago SFWA had to threaten suit against |
|
a website that was selling copies of authors' work without authorization. It never went to court. |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
That's right. But the web is the Wild Wild West. The problem of course, is that anyone |
|
can put up a web site and publish. Luckily, most reputable ISPs will respond. |
|
|
info |
Does that mean that if you don't copyright or register your |
|
story, someone else can take your rights to it away? |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
As I said, regardless of whether you register or not, |
|
you own the copyright and may sue the infringer. |
|
|
The issue is, what are the damages and will it be worth a lawsuit? |
|
|
chatty lady |
What if it's not on purpose? I wrote a story that took place along a specific highway, 101 and was reading a book months later that mentions the same highway, but the story is very different. Two people can have the same idea at the same time, then what? |
|
Daniel Steven |
Yes, there is a principle called |
|
"independent creation." It is a valid defense to infringement. However, let me |
|
|
point out that most new writers tremendously overestimate the |
|
|
danger from infringement. You should concentrate on polishing your craft and your story |
|
|
not worry about whether someone will steal it. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
I have to say that with over 60 short stories published in close to 100 different magazines/anthologies, I have yet to deal with a case of infringement. |
|
So what exactly constitutes 'infringement'? Maybe we'd better get that clear! |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
Simply put, infringement is the copying of another's work |
|
whether in whole or part, and the publication of it in an unauthorized fashion. |
|
|
rupbert |
What if you are writing a biography of someone who is alive? |
|
Do the writer and the storyteller claim rights? |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
This is a big issue that I can' answer simply. It involves |
|
the intersection of privacy law, defamation law, and right of publicity. However |
|
|
I can state generally that the biography of a public person is protected by the |
|
|
first amendment and you are free to write about such person |
|
|
as long as you don't defame them. |
|
|
g.j. |
What's the difference between infringement and plagiarism? |
|
Daniel Steven |
Plagarism is simply a form of infringement -- the wholesale copying of another's work. |
|
pook |
Suppose you write fiction but it includes real life corporate setting and people but you change the names, but someone recognizes, are you liable? |
|
Daniel Steven |
Good question. In fiction, you have much more leeway |
|
than in nonfiction. However, you can still be liable for |
|
|
defamation and invasion of privacy. |
|
|
First, defamation if the person is recognizable and you defame their character. |
|
|
Second, right of privacy. Again if the person is recognizable to others and you reveal |
|
|
private, embarrassing facts about them, |
|
|
you can be liable for invasion of privacy. Therefore |
|
|
it is always best to conceal identities by changing names and characteristics. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
Pook has a question that interests me, too, since we recently had a guest |
|
who wrote 'true crime' thrillers, and used real crimes quite openly. |
|
|
pook |
Suppose you tell the truth about a crime they committed? Is that defamation? |
|
Daniel Steven |
No. First of all, truth is (almost always) a complete defense to defamation. |
|
Secondly, there is no right of privacy with regard to public incidents or matters |
|
|
of public interest, or things that have been reported in the papers or in court. |
|
|
pook |
Suppose it is an event that would be recognized? |
|
Daniel Steven |
If you are reporting a real life event, that's fine, as long as it |
|
does not reveal embarrassing facts about a private person not involved in the event. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
So truth about the murderer is fine, but leave out the innocent passerby? |
|
Daniel Steven |
That's right, or change their name -- since it’s not important. |
|
info |
Is it defamation if you write about a character that someone believes is them when it is not? |
|
Daniel Steven |
That's why they have lawsuits. If the person can prove that most people thought it was them |
|
then the would have a claim if it was defamatory. |
|
|
However, they must show that OTHER people saw them in the character. |
|
|
g.j. |
Could you indicate that although inspired by actual events, this story is a work of fiction? |
|
Daniel Steven |
That' exactly right. It's the old "names are changed to protect the innocent." |
|
rupbert |
Could you explain the intersection of privacy law, defamation law, and right of publicity a bit more, please? |
|
Daniel Steven |
Not unless you have a couple of hours. |
|
That's like asking "explain quantum mechanics in a few paragraphs." |
|
|
However, I can state that privacy law is about |
|
|
not publishing facts that would be hurtful or embarrassing about non-public figures.. |
|
|
and that defamation is about not publishing untrue fact, whether |
|
|
embarrassing or not, that hurt a person's reputation, |
|
|
and that the right of publicity has to do with the commercial exploitation of a public |
|
|
figure. For example, you could write a Broadway play about Humphrey Bogart |
|
|
and that would not violate the right of publicity because it would be biographical |
|
|
and thus protected by the first amendment... However |
|
|
if you were to sell t-shirt advertising your Bogart play, that would be a violation of the |
|
|
right of publicity -- you would be cashing in on Bogart's name and face. Does that help? |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
So it's okay to say that the President does unpleasant personal things, but not okay to say that about your neighbor, and not okay at all if it's not true? Does that work as the Cliff Notes version? At least about defamation? |
|
Daniel Steven |
Yes, in a way. The comment on the President |
|
is protected by the first amendment and the standard for defamation is much |
|
|
higher than with a private person. |
|
|
sailor |
You can't copyright ideas. Plot is idea, so you could copy part of a plot and be ok? |
|
Daniel Steven |
Good question. Yes, in general that's right. Think how often "Romeo and Juliet" has been copied. |
|
Keep in mind that copyright applies to the expression of an idea, not the idea itself |
|
|
which cannot be copyrighted. Thus, your plot idea cannot be copyrighted, but if your write |
|
|
a synopsis of the plot, that's an expression of the idea and the synopsis is automatically copyrighted. |
|
|
pook |
Does the disclaimer about this is fiction protect the writer completely? |
|
Daniel Steven |
Disclaimers for this purpose are generally worthless. Regardless |
|
of what you "disclaim," if you have infringed someone's copyright, or defamed them |
|
|
you are liable. |
|
|
chatty lady |
What if you use someone’s words about a subject, say: flower arranging but you mention who wrote it in the same place you've written it? |
|
Daniel Steven |
It's still infringement. You have to think of it this way. |
|
If you were to steal some money from Jim, would it be all right |
|
|
if, when you bought something with the money, |
|
|
you said, "this money came from Jim." ? |
|
|
Of course not. It is the author who has the right to control how and when |
|
|
their property is displayed. Attribution doesn't make any difference. |
|
|
roe |
Are characters copyrighted? |
|
Daniel Steven |
Yes. They are considered part |
|
of the "derivative rights" inherent in copyright. Thus, for instance |
|
|
you cannot use Luke Skywalker and Obi-Wan in your novels |
|
|
without permission from Paramount. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
And I will chime in here and tell you that most writers, in my experience, are VERY protective of their characters!! Myself included! |
|
You need written permission to use someone else's character, as far as I know. Correct, Daniel? |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
That's right. And it is rarely given. |
|
Mary Rosenblum |
No kidding. :-) I've said no more than once. |
|
Daniel Steven |
Let me add one caveat. |
|
You may remember a recent case involving Gone with The Wind. |
|
|
A writer used the characters from the original novel |
|
|
however, she used them in a parody, which is an exception to the rule. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
But as I recall it was a hotly contested case, was it not? And of course, a lot of money was involved. |
|
Daniel Steven |
That's right. And it was never tried... it was settled, I think in exchange for a share of the |
|
royalties from the new book. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
That's what I heard. But then, in your experience, how often DO cases like this go to court? |
|
Daniel Steven |
Infringement cases are only filed |
|
when there is both damages to be gotten |
|
|
AND the defendant would be able to pay those damages. |
|
|
If you get a judgment against someone without any money |
|
|
you've wasted your time. |
|
|
speckledorf |
How does character protection work with fanfic then? |
|
Daniel Steven |
Another great question. Fan fiction generally is an infringement |
|
and there is a great deal of it posted on the web |
|
|
and the authors certainly have the resources to file suit. |
|
|
So why don't they? Simple. They LIKE the fact that their copyright |
|
|
is infringed, because in their case it makes their product more popular. So |
|
|
(and of course this isn't always true) but in general they choose to ignore |
|
|
the infringement. However, I wouldn't rely on forebearance |
|
|
if you are the first one. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
There is a lot of fanfic in SF/Fantasy, and many writers like it because it is an accolade and it does promote their work, but there are some out there who will surely come down on you like an avalanche if you touch their characters! |
|
And a few of them have done so. |
|
|
pook |
Suppose you wrote about a person's illegal act but he was never caught and you say it's fiction. Can he sue you? |
|
Daniel Steven |
That's right, Mary.. It's a gamble, because you are relying on someone not to sue. |
|
If you write something that is true, it is not defamatory. So the issue is, could you prove |
|
|
it was true if he sued you? If so, then you can decide to take the risk. If it is fiction, as |
|
|
I said before, the chances are much smaller that you would be sued for infringement because |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
the person would have to prove that everyone knew it wasn't fiction. |
|
rupbert |
With a biography, the individual may have records, testimonials, and if the writer uses these how can they stay clear of things the story teller may not like? |
|
Daniel Steven |
No, you don't have to do that. Biography gives you much more leeway |
|
because it is public policy to allow such writing. By this I mean |
|
|
that the rules of right of privacy and, in some cases, defamation, are not applicable. |
|
|
However, if the biography is NOT of a public person, you have to be much more careful. |
|
|
patchworkcat |
Hardly any time goes by after a major happening before a TV movie comes out about it -- like the sniper running around the DC and outlying areas here. Once it's been reported the incident becomes fair game? |
|
Daniel Steven |
That is right. Public events, or any event of public interest, may be written about without fear of. |
|
violating the right of privacy. |
|
|
However, you still have to be wary of disclosing facts about people |
|
|
only peripherally involved, who would sue for right of privacy |
|
|
and, in many case, publishers and producers |
|
|
will "buy" the rights to a private person's story to avoid any issues in the future, |
|
|
or to gain access to things that only they can reveal about the story. |
|
|
paja |
How should a writer go about finding a lawyer and when should they start looking? |
|
Mary Rosenblum |
Feel free to advertise here, Daniel! :-) |
|
Daniel Steven |
Well, thanks Mary, but writers generally don't need a lawyer until they have a |
|
publishing contract being offered to them |
|
|
and in many cases, an agent will do just fine. |
|
|
If you don't have an agent, however, I DO recommend that you consult a |
|
|
publishing lawyer (such as me!) to help you, because |
|
|
otherwise you are at the mercy of the publishing industry, which is |
|
|
the last plantation. Also, many agents |
|
|
have very little understanding of publishing contracts beyond the money issues, and |
|
|
there are many other clauses |
|
|
like option clauses, indemnity clauses, etc. that can be very important. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
Let me say this in basic English...1. NOBODY should sign a publishing contract for a book length work without an agent or lawyer, and 2. Your agent should have a connection with a lawyer! |
|
My agent routinely needs to consult with her lawyer and she has been doing this a long time. |
|
|
chatty lady |
Are you an Attorney that we would hire to check a contract we may have received even though you're in D.C., I'm in Nevada and the publisher is in say, Canada or somewhere else? |
|
Daniel Steven |
Yes, I handle publishing contracts all over the country and even internationally. |
|
Almost all publishing contracts contain standard clauses and terms, and they have to |
|
|
be enforceable in all states, although |
|
|
many contracts use New York law as the basis for some legal principles. |
|
|
You needn't worry if your publishing attorney is not where you live. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
I would also like to add this caveat. I have seen a host of predators preying on the hopes of naive writers who represent themselves |
|
as publishers, agents, or book packagers and end up billing the inexperienced author. |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
I couldn't agree more. The number of predators |
|
has exponentially increased with the advent of technology |
|
|
such as e-books and print-on-demand. |
|
|
In addition, the number of predatory "agents" has increased, with the rise |
|
|
of the "fee-paying" agent. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
For a LOT of extraneous services. If you are approached by someone offering to publish your book DO send the contract to a lawyer like Daniel. I know of people who have received bills for thousands of dollars for 'services'. |
|
The fact that a lawyer is even involved will help you. |
|
|
rupbert |
In the Jessica Lynch case, how does the author and Jessica |
|
share royalites? |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
I don't know the details, but I can say |
|
that anyone could have written the "Jessica Lynch" story without |
|
|
her permission, since it is all public. |
|
|
However, the book co-authored by her would have been written by |
|
|
a writer who took a portion of the royalties (usually one-half). And the publisher |
|
|
would have, as I mentioned before, bought the "rights" to Jessica's story. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
I know people who have done this. The percentages are spelled out in the publishing contract. |
|
roe |
If someone starts a story with a character, writes about a chapter then gives it to you to finish, who owns the portion you wrote, say maybe 10 chapters? |
|
Mary Rosenblum |
roe tells me that the book was never finished, Daniel. |
|
Daniel Steven |
Under the law, if there is more than one author to a work |
|
then the copyright would be in both their names, unless |
|
|
there is an agreement to the contrary. That is why |
|
|
it is so important to have a collaboration agreement. In the situation you |
|
|
describe, even though you wrote only one chapter, you would be able to register the |
|
|
copyright in both your name and the other author's as a "joint work." |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
I have done several collaborations and have always written up a formal agreement. It was useful once in a difficult situation where my co author and myself had a parting of the ways. |
|
It made it simpler to sort out who owned which characters! We were both using ours in other works. |
|
|
It would have been ugly without that agreement. |
|
|
paja |
Daniel, do you mean contract for book only or for shorter work as well being the point to find a lawyer? |
|
Daniel Steven |
Well, of course you can always use a lawyer to |
|
review a magazine contributor's agreement |
|
|
but generally there isn't enough money involved to make this worthwhile |
|
|
unless you wish to be educated for the future, so that |
|
|
as a magazine writer, you will know how to negotiate from strength. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
While we're on the topic of short work here, I'd like to talk about the mushrooming epublishing industry, because I am seeing some APPALLING contracts out there, |
|
many of which are either so vague as to mean nothing, or simply ask for 'All rights' which is something I counsel |
|
|
writers NEVER to grant. |
|
|
Can you suggest what a writer should and should not sell as electronic rights |
|
|
and what should be included in an e-contract? |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
Well, I can certainly suggest, but unfortunately, there often is little choice. Since the Tasini vs. New York Times case |
|
three years ago, most major magazines and newspapers are now requiring contributors to assign all rights. |
|
|
However, if you have a choice, I recommend that you agree to give electronic rights only for a limited period of time |
|
|
in exchange for the original payment. |
|
|
Thus, let's say your magazine offers you $500 for an article and wants to keep it online indefinitely. |
|
|
I would counter by saying they could keep it online for 3 years, but then would be required to pay you another $500. |
|
|
for an additional period. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
It is indeed difficult to negotiate with the big magazines, but what I see are small ezines that want all rights with no mention of a time limit at all, for very little money. In many cases, I simply think the editor doesn't know what he/she needs to buy. |
|
But if a writer grants 'all rights' |
|
|
then that piece cannot be submitted to another publisher ever, yes? |
|
|
If there is no time limit? |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
That is right. A writer should NEVER give all rights indefinitely. Remember, this is your stock in trade. |
|
Treat it that way. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
And I would also like to add here, that some of my short stories have brought me as much money as a novel |
|
because I have sold them many times. So you DO want to keep those rights! |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
Right. To make it simple, if you are selling a story or article, your starting point should be |
|
first serial rights only, or one-time rights if already published. This means |
|
|
that the mag can only publish it once, and then you are free to sell it elsewhere. If they want to archive it online |
|
|
then you should put a limit on this. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
For example, I buy one time exclusive rights for a year, for the LR website...and after that, you can publish it elsewhere. |
|
Daniel Steven |
That's right, that's the way to handle online only -- time-limit it. |
|
Mary Rosenblum |
If I want to keep it up longer, I have to repurchase the rights. |
|
mbvoelker |
I've seen guidelines that claim the magazine buys "no rights" (usually for no payment). If a person who knew no better sold a piece that way what rights has he/she actually lost? |
|
Daniel Steven |
I don't understand. If they have "no rights" then they can't publish it. It would be infringement. What they |
|
really mean is that they are taking a non-exclusive right to publish |
|
|
but you still have to put a time limit on it. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
And the problem with this, is if you choose to sell that story to, say, Fantasy and Science Fiction magazine, |
|
Gordon, the editor, will only pay for 'second serial rights |
|
|
because you have published it already. And he doesn’t pay much for those. |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
Exactly. There can only be ONE "first serial rights." You should try to get the most for it. |
|
paja |
How do you get an online publisher to keep the time limit on archiving your work? |
|
Daniel Steven |
Again. it's the Wild West. There is no regulation. You'll just have to check up on them |
|
and if they don't take it down, you threaten an infringement suit. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
On a nice legal letterhead. Good reason to have a relationship with a lawyer. :-) |
|
Daniel Steven |
Keep in mind one additional fact. |
|
Regardless of whether an e-publisher "takes down" your story |
|
|
it may still exist for years on the web. Google has an archive of millions of pages |
|
|
and there is something called the "Wayback Machine" that archives sites back to the |
|
|
early 90's. This is an infringement suit waiting to happen. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
No kidding. But also, most publishers and editors are aware of that problem. |
|
Daniel, I want to touch on a topic we haven't addressed yet. |
|
|
which is the Public Domain issue...fair use, and most especially |
|
|
song lyrics! A lot of my students love to include 'em. |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
Yes, this is a common question. We all love to include song lyrics, because they often are a great |
|
expression of the feeling we want to convey. However, you must remember that song lyrics |
|
|
are under copyright just the same as prose. Therefore, you must have permission from the song publisher |
|
|
to use the lyrics in your book or story. Quite often, this is not practical, but that's the way it is. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
I have also heard that the labels are VERY hard nosed about use of any song lyric and charge for it. |
|
That's hearsay only. Truth there, do you know? |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
Yes, but its even more complicated than that. Now we're in the realm of the entertainment |
|
industry, and we're dealing with music copyright, which is split up differently than prose copyright, between |
|
|
the composer, and the "publisher," and is often assigned to the label. Suffice it to say that, although |
|
|
you generally will be able to identify the owner of songs, they seldom will grant you permission. |
|
|
roe |
Are popular lines like "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn," copyrighted? |
|
Daniel Steven |
In general, titles, short phrases and slogans cannot be copyrighted. However, in some cases a phrase |
|
is trademarked, and thus you cannot use the phrase in a commercial sense. In your example, |
|
|
as far as I know, you are free to use the phrase. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
Let's talk about characters for a minute, if you please. When does a popular character |
|
like Sherlock Holmes or Frankenstein become public domaine? And I know Holmes is NOT because |
|
|
a friend of mine just had to get permission to use him. |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
A character will go into public domain when the underlying copyright expires. Sherlock Holmes comes under |
|
British copyright, which is honored in U.S., and is apparently still active. Thus, permission is necessary... or |
|
|
it is possible that the estate of Conan Doyle trademarked the character. Frankenstein, however, as far as I know, |
|
|
is in the public domain. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
The estate has extended the copyright, Daniel. They keep CLOSE control of Sherlock! |
|
What is the year length of copyright? I can't recall. |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
That makes sense. |
|
In the U.S. copyright since 1978 is the life of the author plus 70 years. For "works made for hire," |
|
|
however, it is a flat 90 years. However, keep in mind that |
|
|
works copyrighted before 1978 are under a complex set of rules that make my head spin. So |
|
|
better to know this, in the U.S. anything created before 1923 is in the public domain. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
Good rule of thumb! |
|
mbvoelker |
I've found articles of mine translated into Polish and Chinese without my having known about it. Does a writer have any options when this happens internationally or should I just be glad they put my name on them and count them as publicity and credits? |
|
Mary Rosenblum |
I'm laughing. My work is all over the globe...and only occasionally paid for! |
|
Daniel Steven |
Most developed countries in the world belong to either the Uniform Copyright Convention or the Berne Convention. |
|
What this means is that they will protect your U.S. copyright. |
|
|
But it's not very useful for the small guy because, unless the publisher has offices or does business in the U.S. |
|
|
you'll have to sue them in their country. |
|
|
Hardly an adequate remedy. So, as you said, best to laugh it off. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
Most writers I know grumble and chalk it up to 'international PR'. |
|
Dan, you have given us a GREAT education in the legal side of writing! Tell us about your mysteries...what are you working on? |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
I currently have a serial murder mystery being circulated by my agent, and am working on a historical suspense |
|
novel set in WW2 Paris. I also am completing a fictional autobiography of Blackbeard. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
Wow, plus a law career. I'm impressed! |
|
chatty lady |
I am looking for your novel, Clinical Trials to find out what was in Jason Connors letter. I shall burst unless I find out soon. Great read so far...thanks . |
|
Daniel Steven |
Glad you like it, Amazon still has it, I think. |
|
pook |
Is the serial murder mystery based on fact? |
|
Daniel Steven |
No, it's totally fiction, but has some unusual twists :-). |
|
speckledorf |
I can recommend Final Remedy...very good. |
|
Daniel Steven |
Thanks! |
|
Mary Rosenblum |
So if people on the website have a contract and need some advice, can they contact you? |
|
Daniel Steven |
Absolutely. They can call me at 301-424-0677, email at dsteven@publishlawyer.com , or check me out at www.publishlawyer.com |
|
Mary Rosenblum |
The links will be in the transcripts, too, posted on the site. |
|
chatty lady |
How are the fee's figured for your services? |
|
Daniel Steven |
Millions of dollars per hour...J |
|
No, really, I generally charge a flat fee, I find it's much better for us poor writers. |
|
|
For instance, I charge a flat fee of $375 to review a publishing agreement. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
That can be a whole lot less expensive than the 20 percent an agent will charge! If that's all the agent does. |
|
Daniel Steven |
Yes, if you've already sold your book, I will save you a lot of money. However, the agent will -- hopefully -- sell your work. |
|
Mary Rosenblum |
Yes, just to be clear, agents do more than simply look at contracts. But sometimes you have the book or series sold and you only need to deal with the contract...Actually |
|
this can apply very directly to those who write Romance |
|
|
since Harlequin takes unagented material. |
|
|
Although I'm not sure their contracts are negotiable! |
|
|
Daniel Steven |
Yes, and science fiction, too. Like Del Rey. |
|
Mary Rosenblum |
Most of the SF/Fantasy/Romance/Horror still take unagented ms, as far as I know. |
|
roe |
What is the name of the book your Agent is circulating |
|
Daniel Steven |
Since I have an agent myself, I obviously find them valuable. But I do my own negotiating! |
|
Holland Beach. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
Interesting! This is the WWII book? |
|
Daniel Steven |
No, that's the serial killer book, set in fictional Holland Beach, in rural Maryland. |
|
Mary Rosenblum |
Ah, got it! Interesting setting! |
|
patchworkcat |
I understand that Daniel is part of a writer's group in Bethesda, MD. Does he have anything to say about that group? |
|
Daniel Steven |
Well, I am a workshop instructor for the Writer's Center of Washington (writer.org). I teach the Suspense and Advanced Suspense Novel workshops. |
|
Mary Rosenblum |
There you go, DC area writers. :-) A good resource. |
|
Dan, thanks SO much for coming. I will definitely ask you back in the future, if you're willing. This has been an excellent education. |
|
|
And I really appreciate it. |
|
|
patchworkcat |
I live in Frederick. Are the workshops open to anyone? |
|
Daniel Steven |
My pleasure. I hope I was helpful. |
|
Yes, the basic workshop is open to anyone. However, the Center charges a fee of $148 for the eight sessions. |
|
|
Mary Rosenblum |
That's a bargain for writers workshops, believe me. |
|
chatty lady |
This was very informative, plus your books are an easy and enjoyable read. Thanks . |
|
Daniel Steven |
My pleasure. |
|
Mary Rosenblum |
Dan, we'll let you go. It has been a great two hours, but I bet your fingers are tired! |
|
patchworkcat |
You'll be hearing from me, Daniel. Thanks so much for the great info! |
|
Mary Rosenblum |
Ditto, that thanks! |
|
Daniel Steven |
Okay, bye! |
Return to Interview Transcripts